Publications

Public concern regarding the effects of noise generated by the detonation of excess and obsolete explosive munitions at U.S. Army demolition ranges is a continuing issue for the Army's demilitarization and disposal groups. Recent concerns of citizens living near the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant (MCAAP) in Oklahoma have lead the U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center (DAC) to conduct a demonstration and evaluation of noise abatement techniques that could be applied to the MCAAP demolition range. With the support of the DAC, MCAAP, and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), three types of noise abatement techniques were applied: aqueous foams, overburden (using combinations of sand beds and dirt coverings), and rubber or steel blast mats. Eight test configurations were studied and twenty-four experiments were conducted on the MCAAP demolition range in July of 2000. Instrumentation and data acquisition systems were fielded for the collection of near-field blast pressures, far-field acoustic pressures, plant boundary seismic signals, and demolition range meteorological conditions. The resulting data has been analyzed and reported, and a ranking of each technique's effects has been provided to the DAC.

An important application of seismic and acoustic unattended ground sensors (UGS) is the estimation of the three dimensional position of an emitting target. Seismic and acoustic data derived from UGS systems provide the taw information to determine these locations, but can be processed and analyzed in a number of ways using varying amounts of auxiliary information. Processing methods to improve arrival time picking for continuous wave sources and methods for determining and defining the seismic velocity model are the primary variables affecting the localization accuracy. Results using field data collected from an underground facility have shown that using an iterative time picking technique significantly improves the accuracy of the resulting derived target location. Other processing techniques show little advantage over simple crosscorrelation along in terms of accuracy, but may improve the ease with which time picks can be made. An average velocity model found through passive listening or a velocity model determined from a calibration source near the target source both result in similar location accuracies, although the use of station correction severely increases the location error.

Questions have arisen regarding the applicability of seismic sensors to detect mining (re-entry) with a tunnel boring machine (TBM). Unlike cut and blast techniques of mining which produce impulsive seismic signals, the TBM produces seismic signals which are of long duration. (There are well established techniques available for detecting and locating the sources of the impulsive signals.) The Yucca Mountain repository offered an opportunity to perform field evaluations of the capabilities of seismic sensors because during much of 1996, mining there was progressing with the use of a TBM. During the mining of the repository`s southern branch, an effort was designed to evaluate whether the TBM could be detected, identified and located using seismic sensors. Three data acquisition stations were established in the Yucca Mountain area to monitor the TBM activity. A ratio of short term average to long term average algorithm was developed for use in detection based on the characteristics shown in the time series. For location of the source of detected signals, FK analysis was used on the array data to estimate back azimuths. The back azimuth from the 3 component system was estimated from the horizontal components. Unique features in the timing of the seismic signal were used to identify the source as the TBM.

Questions have arisen regarding the applicability of seismic sensors to detect mining (re-entry) with a tunnel boring machine (TBM). Unlike cut and blast techniques of mining which produce impulsive seismic signals, the TBM produces seismic signals which are of long duration. (There are well established techniques available for detecting and locating the sources of the impulsive signals.) The Yucca Mountain repository offered an opportunity to perform field evaluations of the capabilities of seismic sensors because during much of 1996, mining there was progressing with the use of a TBM. During the mining of the repository`s southern branch, an effort was designed to evaluate whether the TBM could be detected, identified and located using seismic sensors. Three data acquisition stations were established in the Yucca Mountain area to monitor the TBM activity. A ratio of short term average to long term average algorithm was developed for use in signal detection based on the characteristics shown in the time series. For location of the source of detected signals, FK analysis was used on the array data to estimate back azimuths. The back azimuth from the 3 component system was estimated from the horizontal components. Unique features in the timing of the seismic signal were used to identify the source as the TBM.

DIAMOND FORTUNE was a nuclear explosion detonated inside an 11 m hemispherical cavity in tuff at the Nevada Test Site. Previous cavity explosions such as STERLING and MILL YARD have shown a substantial decrease in the expected ground motion. These types of cavity tests present a serious problem for a Comprehensive Test Ban (CTB). Not only is detection a problem, but presently there is no seismic method to discriminate between a tamped and cavity explosion. DIAMOND FORTUNE allowed us to examine several aspects of a cavity explosion in the context of a CTB. On this test, there were two groups of accelerometers fielded. One group was located in the free-field at sites above and below the cavity within 30 m of the source. The second group consisted of a line of gauges placed in the invert of P-tunnel extending from 44 m to 224 m from the source. The purpose of this arrangement was to measure ground motion in an effort to detect a non-symmetric radiation pattern due to the hemisphere, examine the high frequency propagation of the free-field signals as a possible discriminate, and calculate the decoupling factor. The radiation pattern experiment was conducted in an effort to determine if the asymmetry of a hemispherical cavity could provide a preferred direction of transmission. The analysis indicated a definite radiation pattern with larger amplitudes transmitted through the spherical surface than the plane surface. The possibility of using high frequency signals as a discriminant of tamped versus cavity explosions is implied by the MILL YARD data. MILL YARD was also a nuclear explosion in an 11 m hemispherical cavity. The free-field ground motion signals from this test (<25 m) contained very large high frequency amplitudes ([approx]1000 Hz) in their spectra. DIAMOND FORTUNE also exhibited high frequency signals with comer frequencies twice that of the scaled tamped DISTANT ZENITH event.

The Leo Brady Seismic Net (LBSN) has been used to estimate seismic yields on US nuclear explosion tests for over 30 years. One of the concerns that Non-Proliferation Experiment (NPE) addresses is the yield equivalence between a large conventional explosion and a nuclear explosion. The LSBN consists of five stations that surround the Nevada Test Site (NTS). Because of our previous experience in measuring nuclear explosion yields, we operated this net to record NPE signals. Comparisons were made with 9 nuclear tests in the same volcanic tuff medium and within an 800 m range of the NPE source. The resulting seismic yield determined by each nuclear test ranged from 1.3 to 2.2 kT. Using the same techniques in determining nuclear explosion yields, the 1 kT NPE was measured at 1.7 kT nuclear equivalent yield with a standard deviation of 16%. The individual stations show a non-symmetric radiation pattern with more energy transmitted to the north and south. Comparisons with an nuclear event does not sow any obvious differences between the two tests.

In addition to stress and acceleration measurements made in the inelastic regime, Sandia fielded two triaxial accelerometer packages in the seismic free-field for the NON-PROLIFERATION EXPERIMENT (NPE). The gauges were located at ranges of 190 and 200 m from the center of the ANFO-laden cavity on the opposite sides of a vertical fault. This location allowed us to assess several different seismological aspects related to non-proliferation. The radial and vertical components of the two packages show similar motion. Comparisons are made with similar data from nuclear tests to estimate yield, calculate seismic energy release and to detect spectral differences between nuclear and non-nuclear explosions. The wave forms of NPE differ significantly from nuclear explosions. The first two peak amplitudes of NPE are comparable while the nuclear explosion initial peak is much larger than the second peak. The calculated seismic energies imply that the conventional explosions couple to the medium much better at low frequencies than do nuclear explosions and that nuclear explosions contain more high frequency energy than NPE. Radial and vertical accelerations were integrated for displacement and indicate there was movement across the fault.

One proven method of evading the detection of a nuclear test is to decouple the explosion with a large air-filled cavity. Past tests have shown it is possible to substantially reduce the seismic energy emanating from a nuclear explosion by as much as two, orders of magnitude. The problem is not whether it can be done; the problem is the expense involved in mining a large cavity to fully decouple any reasonable size test. It has been suggested that partial decoupling may exist so some fraction of decoupling may be attained between factors of 1 to 100. MISTY ECHO and MINERAL QUARRY are two nuclear tests which were instrumented to look at this concept. MISTY ECHO was a nuclear explosion conducted in an 11 m hemispherical cavity such that the walls were over driven and reacted in a non-linear manner. MINERAL QUARRY was a nearby tamped event that is used as a reference to compare with MISTY ECHO. The scaled cavity radius of MISTY ECHO was greater than 2m/kt[sup l/3]. Both of these tests had free-field accelerometers located within 400 m of their respective sources. Analysis of surface ground motion is inconclusive on the question of partial decoupling. This is due to the difference in medium properties that the ray paths take to the surface. The free-field configuration alleviates this concern. The analysis consists of cube-root signal MINERAL QUARRYs signal to MISTY ECHO's yield and calculating the ratio of the Fourier amplitudes of both the acceleration and the reduced displacement potentials. The results do not indicate the presence of partial decoupling. In fact, there is a coupling enhancement factor of 2.