Sandia LabNews

“I’m melting, melting” — coal waste diminished by harmless citric acid


Sandia patent frees rare-earth metals from coal ash for phones, computers

FROM THE ASH — Sandia researcher Guangping Xu puts coal ash into a citric acid mixture, to be fed into a reactor under supercritical CO2 conditions (about 70 times atmospheric pressure) to extract rare-earth metals. (Photo by Rebecca Gustaf)

In one of nature’s unexpected bounties, a harmless food-grade solvent has been used to extract highly sought rare-earth metals from coal ash, reducing the amount of ash without damaging the environment and at the same time increasing an important national resource.

Coal ash is the unwanted but widely present residue of coal-fired power. Rare-earth metals are used for a variety of high-tech equipment from smart phones to submarines. The separation method, which uses carbon dioxide, water and food-grade citric acid, is the subject of a Sandia patent application.

“This technique not only recovers rare-earth metals in an environmentally harmless manner but would actually improve environments by reducing the toxicity of coal waste dotting America,” said Guangping Xu, lead Sandia researcher on the project. “Harmless extraction of rare-earth metals from coal ash not only provides a national source of materials essential for computer chips, smart phones and other high-tech products — including fighter jets and submarines — but also make the coal ash cleaner and less toxic, enabling its direct reuse as concrete filler or agricultural topsoil.”

The method, if widely adopted, could make coal ash, currently an environmental pariah, into a commercially viable product, Guangping said.

Environmentally friendly method for mining rare-earth metals

COAL CLEANSER — Sandia technology can be used in extracting rare-earth elements and other critical metals from coal ash. It can also be used as a coal cleanser to remove the toxic materials and sulfur. (Graphic by Guangping Xu)

The most common acids used as chemical separators in mining — nitric, sulfuric or phosphonic acids — also are able to extract rare-earth metals from coal ash but produce large amounts of acid waste, leaving the environment in worse shape than before.

“Environmentally harmful acids would raise cleanup costs beyond economic feasibility in the United States,” Guangping said.

The Sandia process, which uses citric acid as a carrier for rare-earth metals so they separate from coal ash, the host material, was implemented by Guangping. The extraction process is facilitated by using supercritical carbon dioxide solvent.  Guangping’s Sandia colleague Yongliang Xiong suggested citric acid, a commonly used and environmentally friendly chemical for holding metals in solution.

Guangping found that in less than a day, at 70 degrees C (158 degrees F) and 1,100 pounds per square inch pressure (about 70 times ordinary atmospheric pressure), the method extracted 42% of rare-earth metals present in coal waste samples. 

Chinese mines, where 95% of the world’s resources of rare-earth metals are located, achieve less efficient separation while using environmentally damaging methods.

“Theoretically, an American company could use this technique to mine coal and coal byproducts for rare-earth metals and compete with Chinese mining,” said Guangping. Furthermore, for U.S. national security purposes “it is probably reasonable to have alternate sources of rare-earth metals to avoid being at the mercy of a foreign supply.”

BETTER EXTRACTION — Comparison of extraction efficiency between Sandia’s environmentally benign technology and existing method using strong acids, concentrated nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide. (Graphic by Guangping Xu)

Detoxifying coal ash for reuse alone should be worth the effort, he said. There’s no shortage of coal ash as a raw material. According to a paper published as late as 2016 in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, “Approximately 115 million metric tons of coal combustion products are generated annually, and this sum includes 45 million tons of fly ash.”

These numbers remain of interest today, said Guangping.

“If we don’t detoxify and reuse the coal ash, then it will be abandoned in place and cost billions of dollars to clean up over the long term,” he said. To help make that outcome less likely, “we expect tests of our extraction techniques at larger volumes and on a variety of coal-based sources in the near future.”

Carbon sequestration also a possibility

This technology also could open a new avenue for carbon-dioxide reutilization and sequestration, said Guangping’s Sandia colleague Mark Rigali, who with Guangping is exploring the use of citric acid and supercritical carbon dioxide to mine metals from oil and gas shales that are often rich in metals.

“Using existing oil and gas fracking wells, the citric acid and supercritical carbon dioxide can be used cost-effectively to mine metals while disposing of carbon dioxide below ground,” Mark said.

 Subsurface storage of the carbon dioxide should keep it from entering the atmosphere and contributing to climate change.

The work is supported by Sandia’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development office.

Recent articles by Neal Singer