Unlike the previously described models, the flow-stress hardening method is less a specific physical representation and more a generalization of the hardening behaviors to allow greater flexibility in separately describing isotropic hardening and rate-dependence. As such, the generic flow-stress definition of
is used in which \(\hat{\sigma}\) is the rate multiplier that by default is unity (such that the response is rate independent) and \(\tilde{\sigma}_y\) is the isotropic hardening component that may also be specified as,
with \(\sigma_y\) being the constant yield stress and \(K\) is the isotropic hardening that is initially zero and a function of the equivalent plastic strain. A multiplicative decomposition such as this mirrors the general structure used by Johnson and Cook [[1], [2]] although greater flexibility is allowed in terms of the specific form of the rate multiplier.
Given the aforementioned default for rate-dependence, the corresponding multiplier need not be specified. A representation for the isotropic hardening, however, must be specified and can be defined via linear, power-law, Voce, or user-defined representations. For the user-defined case, an isotropic hardening function is required and it must be highlighted that the interpretation differs from the general user-defined hardening model. In this case, as the specified function represents the isotropic hardening, it should start from zero – not yield.
Although the flow-stress hardening model defaults to rate independent, a multiplier may be defined. For rate-dependence, either the previously discussed Johnson-Cook or power-law breakdown models or a user-defined multiplier may be used. For the user-defined capability, the multiplier should be input as a strictly positive function of the equivalent plastic strain rate with a value of one in the rate-independent limit.