# 3.1. Introduction

The SIERRA Low Mach Module: Fuego, henceforth referred to as Fuego, is the key element of the ASC fire environment simulation project. The fire environment simulation project is directed at characterizing both open large-scale pool fires and building enclosure fires. Fuego represents the turbulent, buoyantly-driven incompressible flow, heat transfer, mass transfer, combustion, soot, and absorption coefficient model portion of the simulation software. Using MPMD coupling, Scefire and Nalu handle the participating-media thermal radiation mechanics. This project is an integral part of the SIERRA multi-mechanics software development project. Fuego depends heavily upon the core architecture developments provided by SIERRA for massively parallel computing, solution adaptivity, and mechanics coupling on unstructured grids.

## 3.1.1. Abnormal Thermal Environments

Fuego is part of a suite of numerical simulation tools used to address abnormal thermal environments for nuclear weapon systems [1]. From manufacture to disassembly, a weapon will see three types of environments: normal, hostile, and abnormal. Abnormal environments result from natural phenomena, such as fires, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, lightning strikes, meteor strikes, etc., and human phenomena, generally classified as “accidents”. In general, these phenomena can present thermal, mechanical, and electrical hazards to a weapon system. Nuclear weapon systems must respond to these abnormal environments in a deterministically safe manner.

Fire phenomena in the context of the abnormal thermal environment weapons response issue is part of a three stage process leading from an accident to the system response. For certain scenarios, these stages are uncoupled and may be sequential in time; in others, the stages are tightly coupled and concurrent in time.

The first stage is the initial accident or environmental scenario that is defined typically through probabilistic studies such as historic data involving accident frequencies of a given type, ignition probabilities, etc. These are used to define scenarios for deterministic simulation tools that determine the state of integrity of the weapon system and the distribution of fuel. The weapon integrity is determined by the mechanical, transient-dynamic environment it sees during an accident. For accident scenario description, Fuego is intended to handle the distribution of liquid fuels, although initial implementation will be somewhat limited due to the very broad possibilities (e.g., fuel pools, spills, sprays, porous flows) and complexity involved in two-phase flow.

The second stage is the actual buoyant, turbulent, reacting, flow that is the source of the thermal hazard for the weapon system. Fuego and MPMD-coupled Sierra/PMR are the primary tools that describe the fire phenomenology that links an accident description to thermal radiation and convection on a weapon system. Fire involves a very complex, coupled set of physical phenomena over a very broad range of time and length scales. The key features are the turbulent, buoyant flows involving combustion of the fuel and air, and the formation of soot which results in participating media radiation (Sierra/PMR), and a range of convection heat transfer conditions from free to forced convection (Fuego).

The third stage is the weapon thermal response. As with the fire itself, the response of the warhead to a fire is described by very complex, coupled set of physical phenomena. Simulation will require the coupling of several, separate effects codes for a complete description. Heat from the fire is conducted into the weapon and transmitted by surface-surface radiation. Materials such as foams decompose and result in pressurization. Conduction across engineered joints is pressure dependent as is the decomposition process. Materials such as aluminum can potentially melt and relocate. Energetic materials can decompose and react. Within this environment the engineered fail-safes in the weapon electrical system must operate with high reliability to ensure nuclear safety.

Because of the number of physical phenomena involved from the accident scenario to the weapon response for abnormal thermal environments, and the very disparate time and length scales over which these phenomena occur, it is necessary to have high-performance, massively-parallel, computers to even consider addressing a problem of this scale and complexity. Further, the key to integrating this suite of tools is flexibility of coupling and a common database architecture. Thus it is intended that all the simulation requirements identified above will ride on a common software architecture (SIERRA) with broad coupling flexibilities.

The principal value of the suite of numerical simulation tools is not the description of the accident to response process, but the ability to evaluate prevention and mitigation design strategies. Preventative strategies are primarily applied via administrative controls. Examples include design and maintenance to minimize fuel levels, separation of fuels from air and ignition sources, and/or weapons separate from the combination. Mitigation strategies include suppression (either manually through fire-fighters or by automated fire suppression equipment), design of thermally activated fail-safes, and containment design. In general, multiple barriers exist between fire and health consequences to the general public for nuclear weapons.

## 3.1.2. Document Organization

This document contains theory and numerical details for the Fuego code. A discussion of the physical models and governing transport equations (math models) is given in Math Models. A discussion of the numerical methods that we use to solve the governing transport equations is given in Numerics.

The Einstein notation of repeated indices is used extensively throughout this document. The only exception is for equations involving chemical species where an explicit summation operator is used to imply summation over all chemical species.