Pressure Safety Manual

APPENDIX J – PRESSURE-RELIEF VALVE TEST PROCEDURES AND POLICIES


Subject Matter Experts: Shane Page, and David Paoletta
Contributor: Pressure Safety Committee
MN471000, Issue S
Revision Date: March 31, 2008; Replaces Document Dated: October 8, 2007
Administrative Changes: June 8, 2010, and May 26, 2011, and January 19, 2012



INTRODUCTION

Requirements

Pressure relief valves (PRVs) are an important component for safe operation of a pressure system. Periodic evaluations are required to confirm proper operation of these devices.

Line organizations are responsible for the proper application and maintenance of PRVs. These responsibilities include:

This appendix describes accepted policy on the testing of PRVs in use at SNL, and sets forth the procedures to be used by line organizations that have PRV testing capabilities at SNL.


DESIGNATED PRV TESTING STATIONS AT SNL

Requirements

For PRV tests conducted at SNL, Members of the Workforce shall:

Customer Service Organization

Guidance

Members of the Workforce should refer PRV testing to the Onsite Calibration & Maintenance Department. They will perform tests and supply the data needed by the line to assess whether the PRVs are suitable for use.

New PRVs

Requirements

Members of the Workforce shall:

Tracking

Requirements

Pressure Installers shall:

Documentation

Requirements

Members of the Workforce in line organizations that test their own PRVs shall use an authorized test station and follow the approved test procedures. See SF 2001-PRV, Sandia Designated Pressure Relief Valve Test Station (Word file/Acrobat file), for the necessary approvals and validations required for test stations and operators.

Note: A manufacturer's original specifications and testing data or alternate test procedures and schedules may be acceptable documentation in applications where the normal test intervals and procedures could adversely affect continued valve performance or the overall safety and operation of the system. For complete details on special applications, see Special Cases - Nonroutine Testing Procedures.


HARDWARE FOR PRV TEST STATIONS

Requirements

The line Pressure Advisor and Safety Engineering shall inspect and approve all SNL-authorized PRV test stations. See SF 2001-PRV Sandia Designated Pressure Relief Valve Test Station (Word file/Acrobat file). As a minimum, the following requirements shall be met.

Pressure Indicators

Requirements

Sources for pressure gauge calibration are acceptable if the source meets the requirements of CPR100.3.1, Standards and Calibration. The range, accuracy, and precision of the pressure indicator used for testing shall be commensurate with the valve's set pressure and its tolerances for acceptance or rejection. Follow the guidelines on assembling pressure hardware in Chapter 5, “Selecting and Assembling Pressure Hardware.”

Safety Manifolds

Requirements

A properly configured safety manifold system shall be provided for all test stations. Attention should be given to the proper use of relief valves to protect system components (gauges, etc.) from overpressure, and the vent valves should be located properly to receive pressure from system components after testing. Follow the guidelines described in Chapter 5, “Selecting and Assembling Pressure Hardware,” on assembling pressure hardware.

Test Stations

Requirements

SNL test stations shall be capable of performing these functions, and the operators must be able to meet these requirements:
  1. Visually inspect valves for evidence of external leakage, corrosion, or other types of damage or evidence of usage conditions that may cause the valve to malfunction.
  2. Perform the actual testing of the valve according to the procedures in the following section, PRV Testing Procedures.
  3. Set the pressure for adjustable relief valves following guidelines in the following section, PRV Testing Procedures.

PRV TESTING PROCEDURES

Note: PRV testing consists of making repetitive excursions through the cracking and re-seating pressures and recording those pressure values.

Testing Environment

Requirements

Members of the Workforce shall:

In Situ Testing

Caution: Members of the Workforce shall not allow system maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) to be exceeded during in situ tests.

Note: Because of wide tolerances or first-pop effects, a PRV set at MAWP may need to exceed MAWP by some percentage before cracking open. In situ testing would not be allowed for these cases. The detrimental effects of fatigue caused by pressure cycling to MAWP should also be considered when choosing to test PRVs in place.

Guidance

Members of the Workforce may test valves in-situ if the line Pressure Advisor approves the test setup and proposed procedures.

Adjustable PRVs

Requirements

Members of the Workforce shall:

Testing Valve Parameters

Guidance

Members of the Workforce should consult the Onsite Calibration & Maintenance Department , or other designated test stations, which can test valves for cracking, popping, and re-seat pressures using the specific test procedures described in this section. Other valve parameters, such as leakage, may need to be tested at other facilities by the user. Contact the Pressure Advisor for assistance in testing these other parameters.

ASME Certification

Guidance

Members of the Workforce should be cognizant that:

Cleaning and Repairing Valves

Requirements

Because the Onsite Calibration & Maintenance Department will not clean or repair valves, Members of the Workforce performing these functions shall:

Burst Disks

Requirements

Members of the Workforce shall not have burst disks tested by the Structural Mechanics Engineering Department; they are lot-tested by the manufacturer.

Guidance

Members of the Workforce who use burst disks should specify inspection and replacement intervals for burst disks in the system Data Package.

Specific Test Procedures

Requirements

Operators of PRV test stations shall follow this testing procedure:
  1. Steadily increase the pressure on the PRV, slowing the rate of increase as you approach the set pressure. A slow rate of increase is needed to accurately determine the cracking pressure. A metering valve may help control the rate of pressure increase.
  2. Record the initial cracking pressure. Measuring and recording popping pressures is optional. After reducing the pressure, record the initial re-seat pressure. Cracking, popping, and re-seat effects can be detected visually on the test gauge, by sound, or by monitoring flow. Record operator-observed valve leakage upon re-seat on the test data sheet.
  3. Record and report unusual first-pop effects to the user, as this may help determine the adequacy of the line's periodic inspections and may call for more frequent manual operations of the valve. Valves that will not settle in and give repeatable cracking or popping pressures (within 5% of previous readings) should be considered unreliable and therefore should be rejected. The user or line Pressure Advisor shall make this determination.
  4. Repeat this procedure to get at least two additional measurements of cracking, popping and re-seat pressures.
  5. Compute the average of the above measurements.

    Note: If the first set of test pressures were significantly different than the repetitive values, do not include them in the average. Use an average of three or more readings taken when the valve has been exercised.

  6. Record and report to the user any other valve characteristics observed.
  7. Compare the average value determined in step 5 to the valve's nominal set pressure and refer to the tolerance charts in Table J-1 or the manufacturer's specifications.
  8. Note any operational conditions such as leakage or chatter upon re-seat in the comments section of the test data sheet.
  9. Document the operational test results and the application. The approval for use shall be made by the system's Pressure Installer or line Pressure Advisor
  10. Consult Table J-1, Tolerances Guidelines for PRV Testing, when determining operational characteristics and acceptance of a PRV.

Table J-1. Tolerance Guidelines for PRV Testing

Nominal Cracking Pressures
(psig)
Non-ASME Code Valves
(% tolerance)
ASME Code Valves
(% tolerance)
0 to 5

5 to 10

10 to 25

25 to 500

500 to 2000

Over 2000

±25%

±15%

±10%

±5%

±4%

±3%

Consult the applicable ASME Code
Notes:

  1. In all cases, the application of a PRV influences the parameters tested, procedures required, and the acceptance/rejection criteria. The line organization shall make the above determinations under the guidance of the system Pressure Installer or Pressure Advisor.

  2. The tolerances listed above represent general guidelines for acceptable test results as developed with time and experience in PRV testing. Test results outside the above tolerances may indicate unusual valve performance and may be cause for rejection of the valve. In these cases, consult the manufacturer's specifications for tolerances relevant to that particular valve and justify the acceptance or rejection of a valve's performance in the comments section of the "PRV Test Data Sheet" (Word file/Acrobat file) of SF 2001-PRV, Sandia Designated Pressure Relief Valve Test Station.

  3. In cases where valve leakage upon re-seat is noted, the application of the valve and the significance and safety implications of its leakage shall be considered by the line when determining acceptance or rejection.


DATA RECORDING AND RECORD KEEPING

Interpreting and Recording Test Data

Requirements

The operators of PRV test stations shall provide a copy of the test data to the line.

The line representative (system Pressure Installer or Pressure Advisor) shall be responsible to:

Test Data Sheet

Requirements

The operators of PRV test stations shall:

Rejected Valves

Requirements

The operators of PRV test stations shall return rejected valves to the valve owner along with the test results.

The valve owner shall:


SPECIAL CASES - NONROUTINE TESTING PROCEDURES

Note: In some cases, performance of the routine test procedures at stated intervals (see PRV Testing Procedures) would degrade valve performance or adversely affect the overall safe operation of a system. In such cases, special test procedures or intervals are then necessary.

Requirements

Members of the Workforce shall:

Guidance

For special cases, Members of the Workforce should consider the following topics of this section.

Documentation of Incompatibility

Document the reasons that the valve in question is not compatible with routine test procedures and/or intervals.

Alternate or Redundant Safety Measures

Alternate or redundant safety features of a system (excess flow valves, microprocessor control of interlocks, etc.) should be emphasized and included in the system data package. The acceptance or rejection criteria for the PRV may be influenced by these alternate safety features.

Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Specification and Testing

OEM specifications and testing from a known, reputable manufacturer are acceptable in lieu of in-house testing to place a valve into service for an initial interval. The manufacturer must, as a minimum, perform 100% testing of set and re-seat pressures. Other tests may also be required depending on the valve's application. Members of the Workforce should consult their Pressure Advisor, or the Safety Engineering SMEs for guidance on the acceptance of new PRVs.

Inspection and Replacement Intervals

*Requirements


RECALL OF PRVs AND MONITORING OF TEST INTERVALS

Requirements

Pressure Installers shall be responsible for monitoring test intervals of relief valves within their cognizance. See Chapter 8, "Servicing Pressure Vessels and Components," for a complete listing of the responsibilities concerning pressure relief valves.

Replacement Valves

Requirements

Pressure Installers shall have replacement PRVs tested and ready for use before shutting down a system to replace valves due for re-test. The valve needing re-test may leak or for some reason fail its re-test. Without replacement valves, the system must then be shut down until a suitable replacement valve can be procured.

Note: Lockout/Tagout procedures may need to be followed where systems would be left unprotected.


Shane Page, srpage@sandia.gov
Al Bendure, aobendu@sandia.gov


Privacy and Security